Month: February 2016

  • #NeverTrump

    Conservatives are freaking out.

    Awww… I’m almost sad for them. Who coulda knowd that decades of culturing racist/xenophobic/nationalist ignorance would create a place where a racist/xenophobic/nationalist ignoramus would thrive?

  • Not Really A Terrible Situation

    Last week, I wrote this about the Supreme Court’s vacancy:

    assuming Kennedy swings the same way, decisions that would’ve swung liberal will still swing liberal. decisions that would’ve swing conservative will go back to the lower court; but that is not necessarily a conservative victory – that depends on what the lower court said in the first place. sometimes conservatives challenge lower court rulings, after all.

    and, since conservatives have one fewer solid vote, the likelihood of conservative-friendly cases even being accepted to be heard is reduced (takes 4 votes to hear a case)

    Today,
    TPM wrote this:

    The Supreme Court has only been in session without Justice Antonin Scalia for a week. But already, his death is affecting cases, and particularly decisions not to take certain cases to the Supreme Court without the guarantee of his vote. Last week, Dow Chemical made headlines by opting for a $835 million settlement in a class action lawsuit rather than risk having the case heard by a Scalia-less Supreme Court. A lower court had already ruled against the company for allegedly conspiring to fix prices for industrial chemicals, and prior to the settlement, Dow had appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn the ruling.

    But it’s not just corporate interests that are quickly recalibrating their legal strategy with the loss of Scalia. A guns right groups decided to forgo a Supreme Court petition last week because the court had lost its conservative tilt.

    What the GOP is fighting against is having a 5-3-1 situation in favor of liberal judges, instead of the 4-4-1 situation that existed before Scalia died. But a 4-3-1 situation in favor of liberals isn’t such a great place for the GOP to be, either.

    Not that this excuses the GOP’s latest tantrum.

  • Tweet

  • Daddy’s Gonna Kill Ralphie

    Looks like Rubio finally grew a pair.

    Let me tell you something, last night in the debate, during one of the breaks — two of the breaks — he [Trump] went backstage, he was having a meltdown. First he had this little makeup thing applying, like, makeup around his mustache because he had one of those sweat mustaches. Then, then he asked for a full-length mirror. I don’t know why, because the podium goes up to here. But he wanted a full-length mirror. Maybe to make sure his pants weren’t wet — I don’t know.”

    Oof.

    A Christmas Story – Ralphie Beats Up Bully

    He’s still a child, though.

  • [adj. noun|noun] : [lib|cons]

    The researchers found conservatives, more than liberals, tend to refer to things by names, instead of describing them in terms of features.

    Examples of this would be saying someone is an idealist rather than describing them as idealistic, or that someone is a pessimist rather than calling them pessimistic.

    If you describe someone as ‘a homosexual’ you’re more likely to be conservative, while calling someone ‘homosexual’ – without the ‘a’ – makes you more liberal.

    This use of nouns, rather than adjectives, is thought to preserve stability, familiarity and tradition, all of which appear to be valued more highly by conservatives than liberals.

  • Walkin’ Blues

    Let’s listen to the Hindu Love Gods! (REM – Stipe + Warren Zevon)

    Hindu Love Gods – Walkin' Blues [Robert Johnson's cover]

    You’re welcome.