This is probably the most-famous of all the archeopteryx fossils:

And it's probably the most recognizable fossil ever. "Lucy" might be the most famous, mostly because of what she represents; but Lucy ain't much to look at.
So, three weeks ago, I got a tattoo of that archeopteryx. Here it is, in-progress:

Mmmm... juicy.
And here it is, (nearly) all peeled and scab-free:

For a week or so, the colors were completely wrong; it was red and green instead of tan and black like it was supposed to be. I was convinced the guy who did it was colorblind and accidentally used the wrong inks. Seriously. I was completely bummed-out. Total regret. But that was just the redness of my irritated skin showing through, and after a week or so, the redness started to fade a bit, the dead skin began to peel off, and the actual colors appeared. Underneath the gore and debris, it looked much much much better. Now, three weeks after I got it, I like it. What a relief!
Now I'm thinking I should fill the rest of that calf with other Solnhofen fossils: a fish, some insects, shells, maybe a fern or something - all surrounded by that same light tan sandstone color. Am I up for more of that kind of pain, though ? That's the big question.

Nikon model used for pix not listed . . .
??????
updated!
A D90? Wow, we coulda had VIDEO . . .
i could’ve made a video with the little Canon, too, but that would’ve been a pretty pathetic scene … me gasping and grunting for three hours, while my wife and the tattoo guy talked about all the people he’s done who’ve passed out and soiled themselves while getting their tattoos (all of them were men).
i haven’t figured out how to do videos with the D90 yet, though. i hate looking in the manual and note of the buttons have the standard “roll of film” icon.
So, I actually have the same fossil tattoo. Weird coincidence. Got it back in 2007.