'Religious Liberty' Meets The Flying Spaghetti Monster

But is it a religion? And does Cavanaugh’s professed belief in an all-powerful clump of pasta and meatballs grant him the freedom not to follow certain legal restrictions in much the same way that the owners of Hobby Lobby do not need to provide their employees with birth control coverage?This question, Gerrard writes, turns out to be much more difficult than it initially may seem. “Candidly,” the judge admits in his opinion, “propositions from existing caselaw are not particularly well-suited for such a situation, because they developed to address more ad hoc creeds, not a comprehensive but plainly satirical doctrine.”

Source: ThinkProgress

One thought on “'Religious Liberty' Meets The Flying Spaghetti Monster

  1. HinTN

    I understand why the judge ruled as he did. The unanswered question, which I hope appellants raise, is how may “beliefs” be placed above the law?

Comments are closed.