Several senior White House officials have begun discussing whether to push for a temporary payroll tax cut as a way to arrest an economic slowdown, three people familiar with the discussions said, revealing the growing concerns by President Trump’s top economic aides.
The talks are still in their early stages, and the officials have not decided whether to formally push Congress to approve the cut, these people said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to disclose internal discussions. But the White House in recent days has begun searching for proposals that could halt a slowing economy
Fiscal responsibility? That’s for suckers.
Actual Washington Post headline:
Two women in a Michigan cul-de-sac fret over the Democrats’ leftward lurch and another Trump term
Next up: The Two Guys Sitting On That Stoop Over There Think Trump’s Pretty Good
I’m pretty flexible about whoever gets to run against Trump next year. Really, any of them would be better.
But, still, can it not be Joe Biden ?
We don’t need an old white guy who makes the exact same gaffes and ridiculous boasts as the current old white guy.
I can’t believe I missed this at the time.
Turns out that the people in the crowd at Trump’s weird 2015 campaign launch announcement (when he descended the gold escalator) were paid actors. Well, since this is Trump we’re talking about, the actors were not paid until they filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission, four months later.
Trump is off the hook.
I never thought it would turn out otherwise. He’s just not smart enough to have collaborated, nor would he be able to keep his mouth shut about it if he did.
Oh well. We’ll have to get rid of him the hard way… one vote at a time.
As of December 2018; 136 individuals have filed with the Federal Election Commission to run for President in the Democratic Party primary.
I hope that’s a made-up number.
Fractional voting FTW.
The root of our problem is that each Congressional district elects just one person, in a winner-take-all election where you only need to win by one vote. This means that the losers end up with a Representative who simply doesn’t represent them. This means that, in a close election, 49.9% of the voters can be effectively disenfranchised. Even in lopsided victories, where 70% of the voters support the winner, the remaining 30% are stuck with someone who doesn’t represent them.
The solution: elect TWO representatives from each Congressional district, and award them each a fractional vote in Congress. Each of the top two vote-getters would have a Congressional vote that is proportional to the number of voters who supported them. Thus if a district elects a Democrat (D) with 55% of the vote, and the losing Republican (R) gets 45%, both of them go to Congress, and D gets 0.55 votes while R gets 0.45 votes.
Interesting. It solves gerrymandering. It handles races with more than two candidates by dropping all but the top two finishers from the calculation to determine voting weight. And it will teach everyone about fractions, rounding and significant digits!
Across the state, Republican candidates for Congress won 50.3 percent of the vote and Democrats won 48.4 percent of the vote, according to a News & Observer analysis of vote totals. Democrats did not have a candidate in Eastern North Carolina’s 3rd district, won by Republican incumbent Rep. Walter Jones.
Dems only ran in 12 of NC’s 13 Congressional districts.
They still got 48.4% of the total votes.
And they only won 3 seats.